
It wouldn’t be news if I told you our planet has its environmental problems. We’re making some progress in controlling what we put into the air, put into our landfills and even put into our oceans. But we’re not paying enough attention to what we are taking out of our oceans – sharks – and they’re being killed at the rate of up to 73 million per year. That number refers to the number being killed only for their fins and almost entirely to make shark fin soup. You may not really care much about sharks but our oceans account for about half of the planet’s oxygen supply and sharks play a key role in maintaining the health of the oceans.
I have to admit that until recently I didn’t know much about sharks, or cared to. Then I saw the television documentary Sharkwater and it changed forever the way I look at sharks. So I decided to do some research myself and, lo and behold, they weren’t exaggerating a bit; the bulk of the shark population is being depleted for their fins.
If I was referring to the ever-happy dolphin or a baby seal instead of sharks, I’d have people lining up behind me. But, one mention of the “S” word sends a shiver down many a spine. Maybe you’ve seen the movie Jaws or heard a man-eating shark story, or both. Even if you’ve never seen a shark outside of your local city aquarium you probably still think of them as villains. If you feel this way, you’re not alone, but it might surprise you to know that although there are more than 350 distinct species of sharks, only a few even bother with humans. The giant Whale Shark doesn’t even have teeth.
Shark-like fish have been in existence for about 400 million years and even before the dinosaurs. Mother Nature put them in every ocean but, because they are resilient, she built in a number of natural controllers: relatively short life spans (20 to 30 years), long gestation periods, small number of young, and slow maturity rates. With all these constraints, they basically regulate themselves. But what she didn’t count on was the human factor.
73 million sharks a year are being served up to make celebration soup.
As of late 2009, the world’s population of sharks had already diminished by 50 to 75%. A North Atlantic population survey reports as much as an 89% decrease. Also, the stats from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources “IUCN” Red List of Threatened Species show that for the 181 species of sharks for which they have adequate data, over 64% of those populations are noted as “threatened” or “vulnerable”. Of those, over 21% are categorized as “endangered” or worse. At least one species is already listed as “extinct in the wild.”
Millions of sharks are unintended catch (or “bycatch”) every year, but sadly, far more are harvested merely for their fins. Sharks are pulled onto fishing boats where their fins are cut off and their bodies are thrown back into the ocean as waste. A large percentage of these animals are still alive and suffocate. Even though less than 5% of the shark is fin, the rest is usually thrown away because of the economics of it. Shark meat must be properly refrigerated and takes up a lot of space on a boat. Fins, however, can be cut off, bundled, and hung to dry in large nets. It is the fin that produces the largest profit by far and can be sold for hundreds of dollars per pound.
Most sharks are harvested to make shark fin soup, or what is known in some cultures as “celebration soup,” and the fin is little more than an additive or garnish. This once rare delicacy is now available at a vast number of restaurants even though the fin is primarily tasteless, has little nutritional value, and is added to a mainly chicken or other meat-based soup.
Sharks are the ocean’s apex predator because they are at top of the food chain and they have few enemies. But this high rank doesn’t come without duties; they are in charge of helping to keep the ocean’s delicate balance of other fish and some marine mammals. Because they seem to eat whatever there is most of, they help control the overpopulation of any one species. This in turn keeps that species from depleting its food source, and so on, right to the last link in the food chain. On the bottom rung is where you’d find plant plankton or “phytoplankton.” This little gem is what produces our oxygen. But this oxygen producer is already on a decline due to climate change and pollution.
The removal of sharks can impact the entire ocean ecosystem causing a disruption of the ocean’s balance. This is called “cascading” – when a decrease in one presence causes an increase in another, and so on. A diminished shark population leaves more of the middle prey and in turn decreases their prey. This would include “bivalves” like oysters, scallops and clams. Significant ocean imbalances can produce decreased ocean oxygen resulting in dead zones, making it non-liveable. Ocean imbalance is a nasty business right from top to bottom.
It’s frightening enough to think that by allowing shark finning we jeopardize their entire existence for the simple prestige of eating expensive soup. But when the shark population is depleted, no amount of money will be able to reverse the damage to our oxygen supply, ecosystems, fishing industries, and possibly a great deal of our own food supply. Of course, even the top experts are still learning about the intricacies of our ocean ecosystems and there is likely more than one opinion on what the biggest environmental problem is. But I’m sure most would agree that the basic law of nature is not to disrupt the food chain.
Most countries now have laws against endangering the population of wild animals. Unfortunately, although some countries have laws against local shark finning, even Canada still allows the unlimited import of shark fin, with the exception of “CITES” (Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species) listed endangered species. However, the identification of species by the fin is extremely difficult as most are pre-skinned and dried prior to inspection sampling. The only way to be sure that the fin is not from an endangered species is DNA testing. Therefore, only a real change in the importing and fisheries regulations of any shark product worldwide will allow their populations to recover. Tough new measures would have to include a ban on importing or exporting fins.
Maybe when we stop the senseless depletion of sharks our future will be back on the menu, in place of “celebration soup.” Now that would be something to celebrate.
Laurel Beauprie enjoys all kinds of writing and is working on a novel. Finning Our Future was previously printed in the Watershed Sentinel, the independent voice for environmental news in British Columbia. Visit: http://www.watershedsentinel.ca

written by Stephanie Seifert , January 14, 2010
written by liza , January 14, 2010
written by Tina , January 14, 2010
written by Joyce , February 01, 2010
http://www.sensoryescapeimages.com/what-is-shark-finning/
Nathan Ciurzynski
www.SensoryEscapeImages.com
written by Nathan Ciurzynski , May 11, 2010
written by adeline , June 01, 2010
written by judy , June 07, 2010
Thanks.
written by Mark DiMaggio , July 10, 2010
written by fiji shark diving , September 24, 2010
written by Yvonne , October 13, 2010
written by Seawitch Artist , January 27, 2011
Please help by signing at
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-red-chilli-restaurants-serving-shark-fin/
We already have the support of the Sharkwater production team, who will publish our results and have put it on their blog. Please join the fight. Thank you
written by Amy , January 28, 2011
written by Philippe , April 19, 2011
written by Sadie , May 05, 2011
written by Ron Awooga , May 08, 2011
written by Skey McLean , May 15, 2011
written by Ron Awooga , May 29, 2011
written by Marcus , June 17, 2011
Only the great white is protected in NZ waters out of our about 112 shark species. Of those, 28 are listed on the World Conservation Union Red List of species threatened with extinction. Really we humans are the monsters. Sea Shepard Conservation Society is the only group I know that really cares about this issue.
written by Mully , June 22, 2011
written by Mully , June 22, 2011
Aha, so you agree that the main issue is not one of terrible implications for mankind or whatever other over the top nonsense usually gets brought up with most any environmental issue. That was just added for dramatic effect to mask that the crux of the issue is...
"Its about greed and selfishness. Its about losing sharks FOREVER!!!!"
No, it's about consuming a resource. How is it selfish or greedy? To reiterate, you may find the permanent loss of sharks through large-scale hunting to be greedy, selfish, sick or any other word you feel like throwing at it. This is your opinion, based on your cultural standards, of what is or isn't acceptable. Do not preach your customs, standards and morals as being superior to folk in other countries.
written by Ron Awooga , June 26, 2011
Firstly sharks are in decline, not mainly due to finning, but to the problem of bycatch from fishermen going after other species.
Secondly, Chinese have every right to enjoy a bit of shark fin soup. Overall the average environmental footprint of a Chinese person is way way less than that of an American, Australian, or European.
Chinese should be allowed their small indulgences.
I'm sick of white people preaching and pontificating to other people what they can and can't do, what they can and can't eat.
In the meantime I will continue to enjoy shark fins soup.
written by Wei , July 01, 2011
written by Trevor Graham , August 06, 2011
written by Ron Awooga , August 11, 2011
Of course human beings are making an impact on sharks and we DO need to monitor the finning. But Shark Fin Soup is NOT the only problem to the decrease of species.
Remember: the soup is a big part of cultures and has been for a while. We can't discriminate these cultures but we CAN make compromises.
written by Layla Amer , January 19, 2012








written by Shikha Parikh , January 13, 2010