Home Blogs Green Muzings University of Victoria Rabbit Cull?

University of Victoria Rabbit Cull?

E-mail Print

Bunny image.

Just days after happy thoughts of fuzzy Easter chicks and soft bunnies were dancing through everyone’s heads, rumors are swirling that the University of Victoria is planning a clandestine cull of the rabbit population currently residing on the picturesque campus.

Comprised of an estimated 1,300 former pet rabbits and their offspring, the bunnies are, for the most part, quite tame and for many students are an integral part of the Vancouver Island campus.

However, what has animal rights’ activists hopping mad is how the university may deal with the bunny abundance problem. Although it is tough to get a straight answer on the fate of the bunnies. Tom Smith, University of Victoria executive director of communications, and spokesperson for the rabbit situation, is currently (and somewhat conveniently) out of town for the next few weeks - a time when animal rights’ activists are certain the extensive cull is going to take place.

Patty Pitts, manager of media relations at the University of Victoria, says she has no knowledge that a cull is planned.

The University of Victoria has tried various options for dealing with the growing rabbit population, including most recently a CAN$17,743 pilot program to attempt to humanely deal with the rabbits.

The ‘pilot project’ explored the feasibility of capturing, sterilizing, and finding new homes for a limited number of the semi-feral rabbits. The project determined that it was relatively easy to humanely capture rabbits, recruit volunteers and engage veterinarians to sterilize the rabbits. According to the university, the problem lay in finding good homes for the rabbits.

So the plan to relocate the rabbits was deemed unsuccessful and now the campus seems to be moving towards the cull option as, according to statements from the university, the rabbits are now damaging property, tree roots, and digging holes in the sports fields that may result in athletes being harmed.

Animal rights' activist Roslyn Cassells has been working to raise awareness about the possibility of a cull and wants the University of Victoria to continue to explore options of finding homes for the rabbits. She worries that the university has been deliberately preparing a disinformation campaign to soften up the public into accepting a cull.

“As I looked further in to this, I felt the university had no intention of letting the animals live and in fact were manufacturing disinformation. The university’s desire to maintain the appearance of doing due diligence on the rabbit issue, without any genuine interest in, or intention of, diverting from their planned course of killing the rabbits,” explains Cassells in a telephone interview. “The university continually refers to its “attempts” or other’s “failed” attempts at resolving the problem using non-lethal means and holds this up as their justification for now promoting a kill.”

Cassells believes that an integral part of preparing the public to accept a cull includes implementing an ineffectual trapping project that is then used as justification for an extermination program.

Either way, the public and media will not be notified if or when the University of Victoria rabbit cull is taking place. Pitts explained that a cull announcement would not be made due to the possibility of security issues, threats to extermination personal and vandalism to equipment.

The BC SPCA did not respond to our requests for a statement, but offers the following message on their website:

The BC SPCA does not support a cull on the rabbit population and urges the University of Victoria to seek every humane alternative to managing the rabbit population on campus. The BC SPCA supports activities that aim to humanely trap, sterilize, and re-home rabbits in suitable homes or sanctuaries that can provide for their needs for the remainder of their lives.

Where the ambiguity, and frankly the anger of animal lovers is focusing, is around the question of if the University of Victoria has really exhausted all possibilities or are they just looking for justification for implementing the quickest and easiest solution. Opinions vary on this particular point.

My opinion is that the University of Victoria let the problem of the abandoned rabbits get out of hand and now simply wants to get rid of the bunnies once and for all. Without question it is a lot cheaper to hire an exterminator organization to destroy all the rabbits than it is to humanely trap them, neuter or spay the animals and spend the time, energy and money to find proper homes for the bunnies.

The University of Victoria is facing a potential PR nightmare if they decide to exterminate a thousand-plus rabbits, but the real responsibility and the focus of anger should be directed at every person who brought home a cute bunny, grew tired of it and then dumped it on the university grounds. We should also save some of our ire for the pet stores who focus solely on profit when selling animals to people without thought to the consequences of their transactions.

I tell myself that it is never too late to stop something, but my experience when dealing with large institutions is that they are usually not willing to listen to anyone but themselves – even when they are wrong.

I urge people to speak up to stop the cull, but I think a more realistic option is to contact the university and tell them that you are willing to adopt one of the University of Victoria bunnies and provide a loving home.

Valerie Williams is a writer living on Salt Spring Island. She is the editor of GreenMuze.com.

Bookmark and Share
Comments (11)Add Comment
UVic’s rabbit situation is the result of years of inaction by the administration, the pet industry exploiting them for profit, people buying on impulse, no bylaws with regard to breeding, lack of education on care and such, and the fact that rabbits are considered as disposable or starter pets for kids.

With regard to the writer’s statement that it is a lot “cheaper” to hire an extermination company, I strongly disagree. The financial cost may initially appear to be less costly. However, ‘culling' has not proven to be sustained or cost-effective with populations of deer, for example. Others quickly fill vacated ecological niches. The same holds true for feral cats. There could also be a "compensatory rebound effect as a reproductive response of a species by which a sudden increase in food resources, due to a sudden decrease in the population, induces a high reproductive rate."

The public looks to educational institutions as places of "higher" knowledge and ethical principles, and expects that decision-makers show both wisdom and compassionate leadership. In its position of power over the rabbits and other animal species calling UVic campus home I suggest that humane solutions are pursued. There is no such thing as a "quick-fix."

Lethal control is not a message to send our young people. Humans are responsible for this; with the constant development and destruction of habitat, we’re demonstrating a total disregard and lack of compassion for the lives of other species. The repercussions and costs are deadly: a violent society with no future. Sadly, it’s the innocent creatures and all the beauty of nature we’re taking along on our path of ruin.
written by Carmina Gooch , April 08, 2010
Don't be stupid to suggest it is cheaper to spend all the money on rehousing the rabbits. UVic wants the cheapest, quickest solution and that is a cull.
written by Betty , April 09, 2010
Culls don't work. If you're talking about being cheap in dollars we all know you get what you're paying for and nothing's cheap. It always turns out being more costly, whatever the cheap deal. One can't measure the harm associated otherwise, such as the value of life.
written by Lou , April 13, 2010
Thanks for a useful summary. There is a petition against the cull at:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com...-rabbits.

Has anyone actually seen a tree or plant harmed by the rabbits? Treewatch asked UVIC Admin but got no response (and has anyone seen any huge muscled soccer players injured by the timid little furbearers? Wouldn't the games played on the sport fields churn up more holes in the wet ground that any rabbit could?)
B. Julian,
Tree Watch
written by Tree Watch Victoria , April 14, 2010
I adopted 3 UVic bunnies last week - I already had rescued one in 2005. I wish there were more people out there that could do the same. Bunnies make wonderful pets! I saw lots of rat poison in the UVic bushes and numerous mysteriously dying older bunnies. I think a stealth "cull" is taking place as I write this.
written by anonymous , April 18, 2010
I tried to find the petition site from the link above as the link above does not provide the entire link address. So here is the full link to the petition:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/13/stop-slaughter-of-u-of-victoria-rabbits
written by D. Koskinen , April 20, 2010
In response to B. Julian of Tree Watch Victoria:

I work on campus and have seen trees and shrubs that rabbits have gnawed the bark off of but don't know whether it harms the trees or not. Facilities Management staff removed shrubbery around some trees in front of the McPherson Library and have installed wire fencing around the trunks to prevent further damage.

I can see UVic Administration's point that rabbits should not be on the sports fields due to their digging which could result in injury to athletes. I don't believe killing them is a solution. They haven't tried installing fencing around the sports fields yet.

I've signed the petition and encourage others to do so as well.
written by CJ , April 21, 2010
Rabbit action on bark can indeed be harmful or fatal to a tree. If they chew through the cambium layer part way around the trunk, the tree is at greater risk for infection and its growth may be stunted. If the cambium is chewed through all around the trunk, the condition is called girdling. In this case, food manufactured by the leaves cannot get to the roots, and they die in about a year. Some of the tulip trees in front of the library have been girdled by rabbits, so this is the last year they will grow leaves.
written by Tony Perodeau , May 02, 2010
Again it is ok for humans to go ahead and get rid of an animal because it inconveniences them. Maybe if people had not dropped off their pets it wouldn't be a problem. All goes back to the stupid human species...there time will come.
written by Ev Ball , May 04, 2010
There are vets who have volunteered to neuter the rabbits for FREE. So I don't see how it's CHEAPER to kill them! Also, UVic is LYING TO U if they are saying the rabbits are not pet rabbits. They ARE pet rabbits! With some human interaction, they are tame as anything. They are NOT wild rabbits.
written by Bern , May 27, 2010
Rabbits are cute...but please, look globally, there are people starving in Africa who could use rabbit meat to survive....bunnies are cute for little children to adore, but we have a very big global food shortage happening....UVIC should be sending those rabbits off on cold storage for feeding the starving of the world....this should be a decision for the welfare of humans not a decision on what is cute and cuddly....
written by Nora , October 03, 2010

Write comment

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 April 2010 )  

flower photo

twitter

GreenMuze Store