Home Blogs The Greenius! Wind Turbines & Bird Deaths

Wind Turbines & Bird Deaths

E-mail Print

Birds in flight.

Dear Greenius,
I’ve heard from four different people lately that wind turbines kill a lot of birds. Though I’ve heard this before from opponents to wind farms, I always thought it was a myth. Is it a myth or an ugly reality?

Signed,
Fond of Feathers

There are certain stories that, like Lindsay Lohan, simply won’t go gently. That wind turbines are cuisinarts for our feathered friends is one of those myths. Or perhaps misconception is more accurate. Turbine haters insist that windmills kill birds. Because…well…because windmills have killed birds. That’s a fact, not up for debate.

The oft-cited example of the Altamont Pass Wind Farms near San Francisco, one of the earliest and largest wind farms with 4,900 small turbines generating wind energy, kills a relatively large number of birds, including some birds that are federally protected.

However, there are a number of problems with Altamont, making it the exception, rather than the rule. For starters, technologists have determined that the small turbines are dangerous to birds and that bigger turbines are more efficient and safer. What’s more, umpteen studies on avian mortality have been conducted, with the results revealing that birds are a whole lot safer around wind turbines than…

Buildings

Buildings kill way more birds annually than wind turbines. Roughly 550-million winged creatures meet their Waterloo in the United States annually. But are people squawking about how we can’t possible build another office tower because it’ll kill birds? Of course not. We’ve accepted them as part of the landscape, though it wouldn’t kill developers to figure out ways to make them less likely to contribute to bird deaths.

Power Lines

They’re second in line as bird-killers, with a figure of 130 million deaths annually.

Cats

Depending on whom you ask, cats are the number one, number two or, according to Al Gore, number three killer of birds.

Cars

Those things we frequently drive to get us to our bird-killing office towers, also murder way more birds than turbines, to the tune of 80-million annually. (They also kill way more people and animals, of course. Not to mention, they pollute the atmosphere while releasing a whole cocktail of chemical contaminants. But turbine haters aren’t proposing a wholesale ban on automobiles. At least not that I’ve heard...)

Pesticides

Though generally invisible, pesticides kill 67-million birds a year.

And wind turbines? Including those pre-2000 ones, before technology created better, safer and more bird-friendly windmills? They kill 28,500 birds each year. Piled up, one on top of another, that would seem like a lot of birds. It is a lot of birds. But compared to all those OTHER bird killers? Not so much.

And of course this analysis doesn’t take into account how many birds die each year because of climate change, air pollution, oil spills…According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, “The greatest threat to birds, and all wildlife, continues to be loss and/or degradation of habitat due…”

At the risk of taking the wind out of your sails, all you turbine detractors…the truth is there’s no need to get your feathers in a ruffle over greatly exaggerated bird deaths.

The Greenius is here to answer your questions – big or small. If you have a question keeping you awake at night, please let us help: Send your eco-queries to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Leslie Garrett is a national award-winning journalist, author and editor, based near Toronto, Canada. She is the author of The Virtuous Consumer: Your Essential Shopping Guide for a Better, Kinder, Healthier World and she has also written a dozen children’s books, including a biography of renowned environmentalist David Suzuki and “EarthSmart”, a book for young children on protecting the environment.

Visit: http://www.virtuousconsumer.com/

Bookmark and Share
Comments (10)Add Comment
You are a green-washed fool. Please get up to speed with what is really happening out there instead of aping the talking points given to you at some point in the past. You obviously have done no real research of your own.

http://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/16094/bird-bat-deaths-prompts-call-for-st-lawrence-valley-wind-moratorium


written by Canadian , August 06, 2010
Actually the article is very thought provoking and makes some excellent points. Building any object in a wilderness is going to affect wild life to some extent - whatever it is and whatever it does.

Coal power plants end up killing untold millions of creatures, as well as humans. They most certainly degrade the environment with pollutants - affecting humans and animals. Wind turbines are a different type of energy production resource, intermittent, but way less polluting than a coal power plant. I'd go for the wind turbine and hydro-electric over coal,...even if bird-life is killed. Set aside more protected breeding grounds for birds, to at least try and compensate for the impact.

The bottom line to all this is not to be an energy-hog, so that fewer energy generating plants, of any kind, are needed.
written by Renewable Energy Researcher , August 06, 2010
Though I balk a bit at the "green-washed fool" accusation, I appreciate you alerting me to the wind turbine project near Wolfe Island in the St. Lawrence. However, as the article you directed me to points out, the avian mortality is alarming in part because it's so much greater than the norm. Clearly something needs to be examined in order to determine why this is so.
It seems reactionary to simply decide that turbines are the problem, given that wind energy is a better alternative than coal or nuclear -- for birds but also for the rest of us.
And regarding research of my own, just so you know, I sat at the base of a turbine holding open a large bag for a considerable amount of time and not one chopped up bird landed in my bag.
written by The Greenius , August 10, 2010
Actually, a lot of us are saying please, no more highrises and power lines ... Probably the same folks who don't think 28,000 bird deaths is nothing. There is always a tendency for people to defend something bad because other things are even worse (pesticides, in this case).

Also, there are other problems with windmills. They are built on concrete (200 wind farms need 10,000 TONS of concrete), and the concrete construction industry is a much worse source of greenhouse gas emission than are cars (see research at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland) - making concrete for a 1 GW wind farm (2million tons concrete) puts 1 million tons CO2 into the air.

ANY energy technology for expansion of human industry, cities etc. is harmful to wildlife and landscape - only lowering human population would be beneficial. See: Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost -- a report recently put out by the London School of Economics -- It compares the cost of delivering family planning technology to those who want it, with the cost of developing various green technologies, and finds it to be at a minimum under one quarter as expensive. (More on this report is at www.optimumpopulation.org)

Thank you,
Barbara at animalit.ca
written by Animalit , August 14, 2010
the Canadian at the top of the page is out on a limb with his argument. I read his link. So a turbine kills a bird a month. Take a look at how many birds died covered in oil or as a result of pesticides. Wind is an improvement as far as environmental impact goes and considering that the industry is new, I am sure that new ideas to protect wildlife better are on the way. Lots of jobs building those things and more jobs keeping them maintained. So turn off your electric world and move back to the trees, everything we do effects this world and this way seems to better than most for electricity generation. Combine this with solar and were on the way to better days.
written by scott , August 15, 2010
I like the idea of solar and wind power...but the 28,000 dead birds is the number now, if we have more turbines the number goes up. How many turbines would we need?
written by mmac , August 15, 2010
As the long term solution to the energy problem the number of windmills will have to be increased by several hundred times (45714 times assuming 1MW turbines) over.
So while the number of birds killed is small now, how much do you think it will be when it has to replace most other types of power generation?
The number of deaths is bound to grow EXPONENTIALLY as well, due to spherical habitat encroachment plots, I wouldn't expect to see flying animals in a windmill powered future at all.

It is not an ecological solution and an argument against windmills. Wind power (which can be generated in many ways) or sustainable power (solar, geo etc) are not argued against here, so quit acting as though you're defending green energy. You're just defending an unsustainable option. A true environmentalist would recognize the danger and push for a different option, such as solar.

From where I'm standing, you seem little more than propaganda advertising mouthpieces for the companies which make windmills.
written by Getty , October 31, 2010
This just proves we need to get our butts in gear and figure out more efficient cheaper solar power panels. In some places solar panels are on the roofs of houses. Why not everywhere???? Our roofs aren't doing anything anyway and then it wouldn't require extra space. It wouldn't therefore as a lot of people are arguing "spoil the countryside view". All that would change is that people would have shiny black roofs. No?
written by AA , February 22, 2011
Energy independence is about consumers becoming independent from power mongers of all kinds. While that is not possible for most it is a goal. The producers of energy have no interest in conservation. Many of these companies are foreign owned and care nothing about our wildlife or environment. The care only about how much American money reaches their countries. This money would be better used to help Americans conserve and attain the greatest level of independence possible. I have been off the grid for over 30 years and am still moving toward that goal.
written by Nevada Smith , March 26, 2011
And solar panels on the ground kill a lot of wildlife too. Consider turtles in the Mojave Desert. It takes many acres of solar panels to equal a small gas fired electric generation station.
written by DrZ , July 25, 2011

Write comment

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 05 August 2010 )  

twitter

GreenMuze Store