
Dear Greenius,
I’ve heard from four different people lately that wind turbines kill a lot of birds. Though I’ve heard this before from opponents to wind farms, I always thought it was a myth. Is it a myth or an ugly reality?
Signed,
Fond of Feathers
There are certain stories that, like Lindsay Lohan, simply won’t go gently. That wind turbines are cuisinarts for our feathered friends is one of those myths. Or perhaps misconception is more accurate. Turbine haters insist that windmills kill birds. Because…well…because windmills have killed birds. That’s a fact, not up for debate.
The oft-cited example of the Altamont Pass Wind Farms near San Francisco, one of the earliest and largest wind farms with 4,900 small turbines generating wind energy, kills a relatively large number of birds, including some birds that are federally protected.
However, there are a number of problems with Altamont, making it the exception, rather than the rule. For starters, technologists have determined that the small turbines are dangerous to birds and that bigger turbines are more efficient and safer. What’s more, umpteen studies on avian mortality have been conducted, with the results revealing that birds are a whole lot safer around wind turbines than…
Buildings
Buildings kill way more birds annually than wind turbines. Roughly 550-million winged creatures meet their Waterloo in the United States annually. But are people squawking about how we can’t possible build another office tower because it’ll kill birds? Of course not. We’ve accepted them as part of the landscape, though it wouldn’t kill developers to figure out ways to make them less likely to contribute to bird deaths.
Power Lines
They’re second in line as bird-killers, with a figure of 130 million deaths annually.
Cats
Depending on whom you ask, cats are the number one, number two or, according to Al Gore, number three killer of birds.
Cars
Those things we frequently drive to get us to our bird-killing office towers, also murder way more birds than turbines, to the tune of 80-million annually. (They also kill way more people and animals, of course. Not to mention, they pollute the atmosphere while releasing a whole cocktail of chemical contaminants. But turbine haters aren’t proposing a wholesale ban on automobiles. At least not that I’ve heard...)
Pesticides
Though generally invisible, pesticides kill 67-million birds a year.
And wind turbines? Including those pre-2000 ones, before technology created better, safer and more bird-friendly windmills? They kill 28,500 birds each year. Piled up, one on top of another, that would seem like a lot of birds. It is a lot of birds. But compared to all those OTHER bird killers? Not so much.
And of course this analysis doesn’t take into account how many birds die each year because of climate change, air pollution, oil spills…According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, “The greatest threat to birds, and all wildlife, continues to be loss and/or degradation of habitat due…”
At the risk of taking the wind out of your sails, all you turbine detractors…the truth is there’s no need to get your feathers in a ruffle over greatly exaggerated bird deaths.
The Greenius is here to answer your questions – big or small. If you have a question keeping you awake at night, please let us help: Send your eco-queries to
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Leslie Garrett is a national award-winning journalist, author and editor, based near Toronto, Canada. She is the author of The Virtuous Consumer: Your Essential Shopping Guide for a Better, Kinder, Healthier World and she has also written a dozen children’s books, including a biography of renowned environmentalist David Suzuki and “EarthSmart”, a book for young children on protecting the environment.
Visit: http://www.virtuousconsumer.com/

Coal power plants end up killing untold millions of creatures, as well as humans. They most certainly degrade the environment with pollutants - affecting humans and animals. Wind turbines are a different type of energy production resource, intermittent, but way less polluting than a coal power plant. I'd go for the wind turbine and hydro-electric over coal,...even if bird-life is killed. Set aside more protected breeding grounds for birds, to at least try and compensate for the impact.
The bottom line to all this is not to be an energy-hog, so that fewer energy generating plants, of any kind, are needed.
written by Renewable Energy Researcher , August 06, 2010
It seems reactionary to simply decide that turbines are the problem, given that wind energy is a better alternative than coal or nuclear -- for birds but also for the rest of us.
And regarding research of my own, just so you know, I sat at the base of a turbine holding open a large bag for a considerable amount of time and not one chopped up bird landed in my bag.
written by The Greenius , August 10, 2010
Also, there are other problems with windmills. They are built on concrete (200 wind farms need 10,000 TONS of concrete), and the concrete construction industry is a much worse source of greenhouse gas emission than are cars (see research at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland) - making concrete for a 1 GW wind farm (2million tons concrete) puts 1 million tons CO2 into the air.
ANY energy technology for expansion of human industry, cities etc. is harmful to wildlife and landscape - only lowering human population would be beneficial. See: Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost -- a report recently put out by the London School of Economics -- It compares the cost of delivering family planning technology to those who want it, with the cost of developing various green technologies, and finds it to be at a minimum under one quarter as expensive. (More on this report is at www.optimumpopulation.org)
Thank you,
Barbara at animalit.ca
written by Animalit , August 14, 2010
written by scott , August 15, 2010
written by mmac , August 15, 2010
So while the number of birds killed is small now, how much do you think it will be when it has to replace most other types of power generation?
The number of deaths is bound to grow EXPONENTIALLY as well, due to spherical habitat encroachment plots, I wouldn't expect to see flying animals in a windmill powered future at all.
It is not an ecological solution and an argument against windmills. Wind power (which can be generated in many ways) or sustainable power (solar, geo etc) are not argued against here, so quit acting as though you're defending green energy. You're just defending an unsustainable option. A true environmentalist would recognize the danger and push for a different option, such as solar.
From where I'm standing, you seem little more than propaganda advertising mouthpieces for the companies which make windmills.
written by Getty , October 31, 2010
written by AA , February 22, 2011
written by Nevada Smith , March 26, 2011
written by DrZ , July 25, 2011







http://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/16094/bird-bat-deaths-prompts-call-for-st-lawrence-valley-wind-moratorium
written by Canadian , August 06, 2010